Connect with us

India

The AIMPLB has appealed to the Supreme Court upholding the hijab prohibition in educational institutions

Published

on

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) appealed to The Supreme court on Monday for special leave to appeal the Karnataka High Court’s verdict in the hijab case, which effectively upheld the state’s ban on wearing the veil at educational institutions.

The Karnataka High Court upheld a government order (GO) on March 15 that gave college development committees of government colleges in the state the authority to prohibit all religious clothing from being worn on campus and to impose uniform dress rules.

The hijab was not an essential religious practice, according to a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi and Justices Krishna S Dixit and JM Khazi, and thus the constitutional articles that grant religious freedom cannot be used to circumvent uniform dress code rules imposed by educational institutions.

Mohammed Fazlurrahim, the Muslim organization’s secretary, and two other petitioners, Munisa Bushra and Jaleesa Sultana, petitioned the Supreme Court.

AIMPLB, Samastha Kerala Jem-iyyathul Ulama, an Islamic clerics’ organization, has also filed a special leave plea in the Supreme Court challenging the Karnataka High Court’s decision on the hijab issue.

The ruling of the High Court, according to the organization, is based on a misinterpretation of the Holy Quran and Hadis, as well as a misunderstanding of Islamic regulations.

‘Don’t sensationalize,’ the Supreme Court said, refusing to hear an appeal against the Karnataka High Court’s decision on the hijab.

It should be remembered that the Supreme Court last week refused to hear petitions against a Karnataka High Court decision that effectively sustained the state’s ban on wearing hijab in educational institutions.

The Supreme Court rejected to set a date for the hearing of the hijab appeals against the Karnataka high court judgment on Thursday, March 24.

Devadatt Kamat, a senior counsel, pleaded before the Supreme Court, noting exams and demanding that the case be heard quickly. According to Advocate Kamat, the pupils’ exams began on March 28 and they would lose a year if they were not permitted inside the classroom without their headscarf.

“Exams have nothing to do with the problem,” Chief Justice NV Ramana observed. Don’t make a big deal out of it.” The court stated that the case would be heard in due course.

Previously, the Supreme Court had declined to hear the appeal promptly and had adjourned the case until after the Holi holiday.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

FDA Suspends Three Dairy Units in Taloja Over Suspected Milk Adulteration

Published

on

Authorities destroy 1,494 litres of suspected adulterated milk and register a criminal case against six people following inspections in Panvel.

The Adulteration

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has suspended the licences of three dairy units in the Taloja industrial area of Panvel following inspections that reportedly revealed violations of food safety and hygiene standards. The action was taken against Mateshwari Foods, Sawariya Milk and Milk Products, and Royal Foods, located in Balaji Industrial Park, Taloja.

During the inspection, FDA officials destroyed 1,494 litres of suspected adulterated milk and seized curd for further examination. Samples have been sent for laboratory testing, and further action will depend on the test results. A criminal case has also been registered against six people at Taloja police station. They are accused of involvement in the production, storage and sale of adulterated food products, raising concerns about the safety of dairy products supplied to consumers.

The FDA’s action highlights the importance of maintaining proper hygiene and following food safety regulations in dairy processing units. Authorities are investigating the matter, and further steps may be taken based on the findings. The incident has also raised concerns about the quality of milk and milk products available in the market, underlining the need for regular inspections to protect public health.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Navi Mumbai AQI Remains Above 100, Activists Demand Stronger Pollution Control

Published

on

Mahape records the city’s highest AQI at 141, while environmentalists call for stricter action and improved pollution standards.

The Demand

Air pollution continues to be a concern in Navi Mumbai, with the Air Quality Index (AQI) remaining above 100 since October 16. According to the Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) National Air Quality Data Management System, the city recorded an AQI of 121 at 2.05 pm on October 19. Mahape reported the highest AQI at 141, while the monitoring station in Sector 2E, Kalamboli, recorded the lowest at 103. Other locations also registered elevated readings, including CBD Belapur (133), Koparipada-Vashi (131), Tondare-Taloja (125), Sanpada (115) and Nerul (109). PM10 and PM2.5 were among the prominent pollutants recorded in CBD Belapur.

Environmental activist BN Kumar criticised the administration’s response, stating that rising pollution levels reflected inadequate regulation of construction activities, vehicle emissions and industrial pollution. He urged residents to demand accountability and concrete measures to protect public health and the environment. Activists have also questioned the difference between India’s AQI classification and that of the United States. Under India’s system, readings between 101 and 200 are classified as ‘Moderately Polluted’. In the US, readings of 101–150 fall under ‘Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups’.

Jyoti Nadkarni, a Kharghar-based resident and environmental activist, called for India to upgrade its pollution standards and give environmental protection greater priority. The elevated AQI levels raise concerns for children, senior citizens and people with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions, who are particularly vulnerable to the effects of air pollution.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Giant Digital Hoardings on Palm Beach Road Raise Tender Violation Concerns

Published

on

Activists question the legality of installations, citing possible tender violations, road safety risks and lack of civic permissions.

The Hoardings

Giant digital hoardings installed at prominent junctions along Palm Beach Road have sparked controversy over alleged tender violations, road safety and civic accountability. Environmental activists and advertising agencies have questioned whether the installations comply with the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation’s (NMMC) advertising contract.

The five-year contract awarded to M/s Ronak Advertising Agency reportedly covers 36 existing hoardings at 30 public and community toilet locations across the city. The agency is said to pay the civic body approximately Rs 2.25 crore annually. However, allegations have emerged that large digital displays have been installed at prominent Palm Beach Road junctions beyond the locations specified in the contract. Activists have demanded an investigation into the permissions granted and compliance with the tender conditions. Local MLA Manda Mhatre had earlier objected to the installation of large hoardings near traffic signals and reportedly sought cancellation of the contract.

Activists have also warned that bright, illuminated displays featuring changing advertisements could distract motorists at busy junctions and increase road safety risks. Questions have additionally been raised about structural safety inspections and compliance with applicable regulations. Environmental activist Bhaskar Machhare said a delegation of activists and advertising contractors had met the municipal commissioner to raise concerns over the allegedly unauthorised installations.

According to Machhare, the commissioner clarified that he had not granted permission for the hoardings and directed the concerned officials to take immediate action. The controversy has intensified demands for a thorough inquiry into the approval process and the role of officials responsible for regulating outdoor advertisements. The civic body’s response and any action against the disputed structures are now being closely watched.

Continue Reading

Trending